Multinationals control the food supply Food and water are fast becoming manipolized by the multinational corporations. This article by Steven Ransom of Credence publications is giving us an inside viewof the dirty politics behind such corporate control
We know that too much sugar is bad for us. What could we use instead?
Artifical sweeteners like saccharin or aspartame, or a natural product? The European Commission decides for us.
Sugar's Turn Last Wednesday in Rome the World Health Organisation and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation jointly launched an independent expert report on diet which stated, among other things, that free (that is, added) sugar should not exceed ten percent of the calories in normal daily food intake....
Health Dangers: Billions Of People Are Now Aspartame Victims "Drug Enforcement Agency". HEALTH CANADA IS NOT ONLY INTERFERING WITH OUR ACCESS TO SAFE AND HEALTH ENHANCING NATURAL FOOD AND HEALTH PRODUCTS SUCH AS STEVIA, NATURAL PROGESTERONE CREAM, AND INDIVIDUAL AMINO ACID FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, BUT THE COSTLY HEALTH CANADA HEALTH POLICE ALSO FAIL TO PROTECT CANADIANS FROM DEADLY TOXIC PRODUCTS SUCH AS ASPARTAME, WHICH SHOULD NOT EVEN BE ON THE MARKET!]
Posted on FriendOfFreedom - By James D. Bowen, MD 3-22-2
Diet Soda Aspartame Dangers - The Scientific Committee for Foods of the European Union is currently evaluating (re-evaluating) the safety of the artificial sweetener ASPARTAME.
We have supplied scientific references that show without the shadow of a doubt the insidious toxicity of this sweetener, but have had no reply.
The following is another message to the Scientific Committee asking that it take a firm stand on ASPARTAME. If you have more information and would like to write to them - now is the time.
Fluoride is as toxic as lead SICKNESS CONTROL 101: FLUORIDE - THE LUNATIC DRUG - "EARTH IS AN INSANE ASYLUM, TO WHICH THE OTHER PLANETS DEPORT THEIR LUNATICS."
January 2003 Codex Alimentarius Commission FAO/WHO - Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses Comments and Scientific Critique on the report of the Working Group to consider Section 3.1 Es-sential Composition in the Proposed Draft Revised Standard for Infant Formula at (Step 3) In the following you find comprehensive scientific evidence that fluoridation has no benefits in prophylaxis of dental caries but inacceptable side effects and risks. Fluoridation is an untenable public health measure. Fluoride is ineffective against dental caries. Download the comments as a Word file
Dentists Show Fluoridation a Failure NEW YORK, May 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Unintentially, studies by dentist/researchers indicate fluoridation fails to reduce tooth decay, especially in the poor, reports the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. Also, fluoride, above that found in toothpaste, confers no alleged benefit to the majority
Fluoride and the A-Bomb Program Flouride is given to us "to keep our teeth healthy ", instead it is an extremely toxic substance, also in a low dosage. This article will explain why flouride is so toxic and how people still earn money on it.
E-Numbers - Isn't it reassuring to know that our food is this nutritious? Complete list of E-Numbers with description a dangers
Canola Oil
Blindness, Mad Cow Disease and Canola Oil- By John Thomas Millions of people have suffered the loss of their vision from glaucoma, a disease involving atrophy (deterioration) of the optic nerve.
